Sunday 13 May 2007

The Winograd Comission report and... hey look! It's Mickey Mouse!


In July of last year (2006) Israel had declared war on Lebanon and Hezbollah in response to the killing and abduction of Israeli Defence Force Soldiers on Israeli territory. The aims of the war were to secure the return of the 2 Israeli soldiers abducted by Hezbollah and to crush the Hezbollah movement within Lebanon whom had been a great source of grievence for the Israeli's since their creation as a liberation movement in the first Lebanon war of 1982 to oust the Israeli's and their occupation of southern Lebanon. A goal they eventually succeeded in achieving when Israel was forced to pull out as a result of wavering public support and the ever rising casualties of it's froces caused by the guerilla attacks of Hezbollah. The war ultimatley failed on both fronts (The 2006 Lebanon war.) and despite having popular public support at it's inception had come up against deep opposition from the Israeli people, it's government and the international community by its end.


By the conflicts conclusion in August the 2 abducted soldiers had not been returned and to date are still the subject of ongoing negotiations between Hezbollah and Israel, although doubts have been raised as to whether the 2 men are in fact still alive after having been reported that the 2 were seriously injured during the raid that also killed 3 other IDF soldiers. The conflict also had the unexpected and adverse effect of making Hezbollah more powerful and influential than they were prior to the war despite the large number of casualties inflicted on them. The brutal and controversial tactics used by Israel during the conflct ended up rallying the Lebanese people behind Hezbollah's cause resulting in a huge surge in popularity after the war. The conflict had propelled the group who had only minority support before the war into a widely supported and legitimized organisation in its aftermath. The conflict also attracted a great deal of criticism of Israel's actions even going as far as accusations of war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law.. By the conflicts end Israel had failed in all it's proposed objectives , had caused over a thousand civillian deaths, over 150 deaths in it's own military forces as well as a small number of casualties in it's own civillian population as a result of Hezbollah's retalliation attacks and had in the process strengthened rather than weakened its enemy. In short the war was a resounding failure.


In the wake of the war there were strong calls for the resignation and removal of Ehud Olmert from his post as Prime Minister. To placate the baying masses and his denouncers he commisioned a report of inquiry into war to establish it's errors and where it's blame lay. The preliminary reports of that commission, the Winograd commission were released at the end of April and reignited and intensified Olmerts opposition. The report found that Olmert himself along with strong criticisms of Minister of Defence Amir Peretz and Chief of Staff Dan Halutz had been responsible for the wars massive failure caused by it's hasty initiation and lack of prior military planning. Although Olmert has vowed that he will not step down from his role as PM his ever mounting opposition puts his future in doubt. It is perhaps only a matter of time before Olmert announces his resignation or is forced out through a no confidence vote from the Knesset. And so arises the question of who will replace him and his position. Tzipi Livni the second in command of the Kadima party stands a good chance of succeeding him in his role but hinges entirely on her ability to hold the current coalition government together in the wake of the controversies. Benjamin Netanyahu also stands a good chance along with his old rival Shimon Peres should he decide to give up on his bid for President in favour of running for Prime Minister. With the fragmented state of the current Knesset and with people like Avigdor Lieberman looming in the background the outcome of the next election whenever it may be could not only prove to be hotly contested and highly unpredictable but could also have a drastic effect on the course Israel will take in the near future.


Indeed the Winograd commission reports are big news in Israel. Exposing the fallibility of the Israeli leadership and it's military and possibly enacting a great change in the Middle East's regional politics central to so many people's interests in the world right now. But what's interesting about this turn of events is how so much of it has been overshadowed and forgotten about in western media thanks to a 6ft tall furry talking mouse called Farfour. Farfour garnered front page spots and massive media attention last week by dispensing radical Islamic rhetoric to children on Palestinian Al-Aqsa TV, a station run by Hamas.. Farfour who bares a not entirely dissimilar resemblance to a certain Disney mascot named Mickey fired up age old controversies over accusations of incitement of violence and the nurturing of political radicalism through media and the influencing of children. The show following it's controversial coverage was promptly pulled from the airwaves for violating Palestinian broadcasting laws. But with the huge coverage that Farfour received along with it's convenient timing you have to wonder if the issue wasn't perhaps blown out of proportion somewhat. Especially when compared with the far more important issue of the political uproar going on in Israel. Not that incitement should be ignored or downplayed especially when it exploits young children but is this really front page news? Is the Winograd report and the huge waves of controversy it caused which has gained fairly minimal media reportage really a far less significant issue? Although I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories Israel is renowned for it's extremely effective PR and while it may not have succeeded in distracting people's attention within Israel it has done a pretty good job of taking the heat off Israel and it's internal self criticisms of misconduct during a war that resulted in over a thousand civillian deaths and refocusing and pointing the media's spotlight elsewhere.

Just a week after the release of the Winograd commission report and amidst the massive ongoing political turmoil in Israel it is almost impossible to find any trace of it's discussion in the media. Meanwhile disuccion of Farfour the Jihadist mouse can still be heard reveberating loudly around our ears. A textbook case of the strength and effectiveness of Israeli PR and gullible and easily distracted attentions of the public. Unfortunatley Islamic radicalism is the order of the day and will always take precedence over criticism of our democratic allies no matter how disproportionate it's importance and significance is. Shock value and the towing of the government line and status quo win out over reporting of genuinely far more important matters.


Sunday 29 April 2007

Azmi Bishara, Avigdor Lieberman and Israel's political climate


Azmi Bishara last week (April 22nd.) announced his resignation from the Israeli Knesset amid a controversial investigation on charges of collaborating with the enemy (i.e. Syria whom Israel is still technically at war with.) and aiding Hezbollah during the recent Israeli attack on Lebanon.

Bishara is one of the small number of Arab Israeli's that make up the current Knesset (Arab Israeli's hold 12 out of 120 of the seats in the current Knesset.) and this isn't the first time Bishara among other Arab members of the Knesset have come under fire. In the 2003 national elections the right wing Herut party attempted to ban Bishara's Balad party (Also known as the NDA.) and another Arab party Ta'al headed by Ahmad Tibi from the elections on charges of supporting terrorism and for not accepting Israel's status as a Jewish state. The ban was approved and passed by the Committee but was later appealed and overturned by the Israeli Supreme council. This followed a previous charge in which he was stripped of his legal immunity, a right given to all members of the Knesset (And most other forms of parliament in other countries around the world.) to allow free and open discussion of political ideas without fear of political persecution.

Bashiri now claims to have been the victim of political intimidation and conspiracy because of his outspoken views against the use of military force against the Palestinians and the treatment of Arabs as second class citizens within the state of Israel. Ahmad Tibi the leader of the Ta'al party also claims to have been subjected to simillar treatment because of his views and opinions on israeli policy.

But while we see the likes of Tibi and Bashiri being politically discriminated against and ostracized for their left wing views and some would even go as far to say simply because of their race we see far-right wing parties coming to the forefront of Israeli politics. One clear example of this has been the rise in strength of Avigdor Lieberman's Yisrael Beiteinu party who now holds the position of deputy Prime Minister and who's party has now become a member of the coalition Kadima government now in power.

Avigdor Liberman has been a very controversial figure in Israeli politics for quite some time for his outspoken hard-line extrememist ideas. The Haaretz newspaper compared him to Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in his extremities. Amoung his most controversial ideas have been those to destroy the Aswan dam and drown Egypt for collaborating with the PLO, the drowning all Palestinian prisoners held by Israel in the Red Sea even going so far as to offer the buses to take them there, the execution of all Arab members of the Knesset and the expulsion of all Arabs living within the state of Israel among other blood curdling declarations. A number of MK's (Members of the Knesset.) show deep oposition to Lieberman's ideas and policies and one member of the Knesset even resigned after his appointment as deputy Prime Minister.

A few years ago scholars, politicians, writers and academics were warning of the extremism in Israeli politics represented by the likes of Lieberman and his Beiteinu party but most simply discarded him as representing only a very small minority of Israeli public and political opinion. It is beyond most people's worst case scenarios that this man is now the deputy Prime Minister of Israel and topped a 2006 poll of who Israeli's would like to see become the next Prime Minister. The thought that this man could become the next Premier of Israel is quite honestly a very disturbing and worrying though.

You have to wonder to what extent this sudden tip to the far right in Israeli politics is represented in Israeli public opinion as whole. Is it merely the result of a small group ambitious heavy handed politicians scrambling for power or is it genuinely representative of a new-found hardline anti-Arab, anti-Palestinian sentiment in the people of Israel. A country who's public opinion just a few years ago showed strong support for peace with Palestine and was even strongly critical of Israel's policies.

It seems ever since Ehud Barak and his goverments failure to achieve peace with Palestine at the camp david talks the Israeli people have been sliding evermore to the right. Perhaps Barak's failure was viewed as a sincere and genuine drive for peace by Israel but ended in total failure. Essentially the only things Israel got out of the talks was a reignited intifada an intensification in attacks and anti-Israeli sentiment within Palestine. Israel lost confidence in the possibility of forming a lasting peace with Palestine and reconcile their differences and so fell back on right wing tendencies. The matter was further confounded by the election of Hamas in the 2006 Palestinian elections and the threats made by Iran's Ahmadinejad and would explain the sudden rise in popularity of people like Lieberman and Beiteinu and other right wing political parties. Unfortunatley a step toward the right is a step backwards for the Israeli people and a step away achieving peace. A peace wanted on both sides, a peace needed for the security of Isreal and a peace needed for the liberation of the Palestinian people.